Skip to main content
Specialized Social Protection Service for People with Disabilities, Elderly and their Families (PSE-M / PCDIF)
Families
+
#2
Services
Geographic coverage:
Relevant for:
Children and adolescents

Description

PCDIF is part of the Specialized Social Protection (PSE) of the Unified Social Assistance System

(SUAS)[i], aimed at people facing rights violations. Situations of violation covered by PSE include, for example, homeless or abandoned people, people in institutional care (or their dependents), or people subject to various forms of violence (domestic, slave labor, human trafficking), in addition to children in child labor. 

PCDIF complements the Protection and Specialized Care

Service for Families and Individuals (PAEFI) by offering support more specifically aimed at people with disabilities, the elderly and their families, who, in addition to these vulnerability factors, face rights violations. Given the characteristics of its target population, PCDIF differs from PAEFI by adopting additional measures to ensure the accessibility of this population, in addition to an additional protocol of activities that support the special care that these people often need. In addition to systematic individual monitoring, PCDIF is also characterized by a strong emphasis on carrying out collective rehabilitation activities, with the dual objective of enabling greater community engagement and offering important therapies for PwD and the elderly, especially those with depression, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, stroke sequelae, among others.

PCDIF is implemented by social assistance teams from the Specialized Reference Centres for Social Assistance - CREAS (main responsible for home care) and Day Centers (which concentrate more community activities based in these spaces). The Day Centers differ from the Living Centers (which offer the Service of Community Living and Strengthening of Bonds - SCFV) because it has an infrastructure more focused on rehabilitation activities than on the performance of recreational and cultural activities. 

PCDIF's activities, although guided by frameworks, are free to vary to best meet the priorities and capitalize on the capacities established in the context of each municipality.

 


[i] SUAS is the abbreviation in Portuguese for Unified Social Assistance System. According to the MDS: “The Unified Social Assistance System is a public system that organizes social assistance services in Brazil. With a participatory management model it coordinates the efforts and resources of the three levels of government, i.e., municipalities, states and the Federal Government, for the execution and financing of the Brazilian Social Assistance Policy (PNAS), directly involving national, state, municipal and Federal District regulatory structures and frameworks. SUAS has 12 nationally typified services, as listed below. 

  • Basic Social Protection 

  1. PAIF – Protection and Integral Support Service to the Family

  2. SCFV – Service of Community Living and Strengthening of Bonds

  3. DPDI – Basic Social Protection Homecare Service for People with Disabilities and the Elderly

  • Specialized Social Protection 

  1. PAEFI – Protection and Specialized Care Service for Families and Individuals

  2. PCDIF – Specialized Social Protection Service for People with Disabilities, the Elderly and their Families

  3. MSE – Social Protection Service for Adolescents under Probation (LA) and Community Services Measures (PSC)

  4. SEAS – Specialized Care for Vulnerable Populations

  5. SEPS – Specialized Homelessness Services

  6. SAI – Institutional Shelter Services

  7. SAR – Communal Housing Services

  8. SFA – Foster Family Service

  9. SCE – Protection services in a declared public calamity and emergencies

These services are subdivided into those of Basic Social Protection (PSB, acronym in Portuguese) and Specialized Social Protection (PSE). The PSB is intended to support people whose social vulnerability exposes them to the risk of having their rights violated, but who are not yet subject to such rights violations. Vulnerabilities that expose people to the risk of having these rights violated include insufficient income, difficulty accessing essential public services (such as health and education), and situations that undermine community and family life (such as in the case of families with dysfunctional relationships or people without ties to their communities). Violations of rights, as already mentioned, are the object of the Specialized Social Protection (PSE) of SUAS, and refer to situations such as abandonment, physical and/or psychological abuse, sexual abuse, use of psychoactive substances, compliance with socio-educational measures, homelessness, child labor, among others.


 

Federal managing body (expense authorizer)

National Secretariat for Social Assistance (SNAS) of the Ministry of Social Development and Assistance, Family and Fight against Hunger – MDS (which during 2019-2022 was designated Ministry of Citizenship – MC), by means of an inter-federative SUAS management structure. Funding is co-participatory between the three levels of government: municipal, state and federal.

Main implementing partner at the municipal level

States and, above all, Municipalities, through CREAS and accredited Day Centers.

Principal parceiro implementador na esfera do município

Estados e, sobretudo, Municípios, por meio de CREAS e Centros Dia credenciados.

Initiative start date

The Service was instituted and regulated from the Brazilian Typification of Social Assistance Services, published on November 11, 2009 and reissued in 20141,2.

Initiative end date

Currently in operation.

Descriptive typology(ies) of the initiative

Social assistance support through a service to Strengthen Community and Family Bonds.

Conditionalities

N/A

Target groups / eligibility criteria

PwD and elderly people in situations of dependency who have their situation aggravated by rights violation.

Eligibility verification mechanisms and the role of administrative records and other databases

Cases can be identified through referral made by the Rights Guarantee System (SGD, acronym in Portuguese)[i], or through the assessment and active search of social assistance teams, and also through referral from other facilities and services of SUAS. 

There is a systemic effort to register the potential public and person benefited by PCDIF in the Single Registry (although this is not a requirement to gain access to the service). 

Rather than a measure to request and access PCDIF, the registration of the potential public in the Single Registry is done to enable the referral of these people to other policies to which they are eligible. 

The information declared to the Single Registry is fundamentally self-declaratory. The Single Registry makes annual cross-checks with other administrative records to validate its information. Cases of inconsistency pointed out by these checks, however, do not lead to interruptions in access to nationally typified SUAS services (although they may lead to such impediments for other programs that use the tool and whose eligibility is defined by more parametric criteria of income and family composition, such as the Bolsa Familia Program - PBF and the Continuous Cash Benefit - BPC). Yet, the link with PCDIF generates an opportunity to update the registration of its beneficiaries whose declared information may be questioned by cross-checks with other databases.

 


[i] SGD is composed of several institutions, such as: federal public agencies, the Public Prosecutor's Office, the Public Defenders' Offices, the Attorney General's Office and state attorney general's offices, police and specialized police stations, guardianship councils, ombudsmen and human rights defense entities responsible for providing legal and social protection, Centers for the Defense of the Rights of Children and Adolescents, among others.

Estimated coverage of the initiative

•    The SUAS CREAS Census indicates that in August 2021 there were a total of 23,403 people served by this service (which is an indication of coverage through services offered at home).3
•    The Day Center SUAS Census indicates that in August 2021 another 6,192 people were served through activities that take place in Day Centers. 

As a result, a total coverage of 29,595 people is estimated between both units (CREAS and Day Centers).


 

Description of the benefits

There is flexibility for social assistance teams to propose activities that reflect local priorities and capacities. In any case, the CREAS Monthly Service Record System (RMA, acronym in Portuguese) reflects some guiding values that should inform the offer of activities when monitoring them through their classification according to the categories listed below:

  • Sheltering and initial listening;

  • Social study;

  • Carrying out daily self-care activities;

  • Guidance on access to BPC;

  • Guidance on access to other benefits;

  • Guidance and support for obtaining personal documentation;

  • Guidance for registration in the Single Registry;

  • Preparation of Individual and/or Family Monitoring Plan;

  • Workshops and collective activities of community living and socialization;

  • Referral to the network of social assistance services;

  • Referral to health network services;

  • Referral to education policy;

  • Referral to services/Units of other public policies;

  • Referral to rights defense bodies (Public Defender's Office, Public Prosecutor's Office, Guardianship Council, Rights Councils, etc.);

  • Monitoring beneficiaries referred to the network;

  • Record of information in medical records;

  • Preparation of reports on cases under follow-up;

  • Home visits;

  • Activities with the beneficiary r's family;

  • Mobilize beneficiaries to access the service;

  • Support and guidance to family caregivers;

  • Guidance on assistive technologies;

  • Guidance and support in self-care;

  • Lectures and workshops involving the community;

  • Provision of material goods.


     

Annual budget / expenditures

SUAS funding is shared by the three levels of government (Federal Government, states and municipalities). Resources are allocated in blocks and minimums, which have some flexibility to finance the various SUAS initiatives (see Policy Brief on SUAS financing). The table below illustrates the budget executions (co-financing) of the Federal Government for discretionary actions of the National Secretariat for Social Assistance/ Social Assistance Fund (SNAS/FNAS) between 2002 and 2022 (in real values corrected to December 31, 2022). These values encompass the entire universe of services, programs, costing of management activities and investment of SUAS, so they do not refer only to the costs of the PCDIF.

Federal budget executions with discretionary actions of SNAS/ FNAS between 2002 and 2022 (in real values adjusted for December 31, 2022)[i]

Year

R$ Millions of BRL

2002

3.885,20

2003

3.023,38

2004

2.308,34

2005

3.208,81

2006

2.615,90

2007

3.039,44

2008

2.902,20

2009

2.957,95

2010

3.252,75

2011

3.049,13

2012

4.040,07

2013

4.587,86

2014

4.320,93

2015

3.457,79

2016

3.485,66

2017

2.899,13

2018

2.995,74

2019

3.628,10

2020

5.010,93

2021

1.281,80

2022

2.295,75

 

Although we did not find consolidated values on the resources specifically directed to PCDIF financing, it is assumed that the Day Center Medium Complexity Fixed Minimum and the Medium Complexity Transition Minimum (which are part of the Specialized Social Protection Block of Medium Complexity) are the most directed to financing the PCDIF. In 2022, the Federal Government transferred a total of R$ 37,442,292.76 to these Minimums[i] (an amount corresponding to 3% of the total expenses of the Federal Government specifically directed to the 12 social assistance services nationally typified by SUAS this year).

 


[i] Minimum values extracted from (GoB, Min. Social Development 2023a) and associated with specific services according to the authors' interpretation from (GoB, Min. Social Development 2013; Public Prosecutor's Office of Bahia, n.d.)

[i] Data from 2002 to 2020 extracted from (GoB, Min. Citizenship 2021d), and 2021 and 2022 data extracted from (GoB, CGU 2022). Monetary correction of amounts made using the Citizen Calculator of the Central Bank of Brazil (GoB, Central Bank, n.d.)

Positive findings regarding the efficiency of the initiative

A quasi-experimental academic study points out that the implementation of SUAS generated expansion and improvement in the provision of services, as well as improvement of administrative capacity at the municipal level, even controlling for more specific political factors[i]. 

However, we did not identify robust studies on the impacts of PCDIF in a more specific way.


 


[i] (Cavalcante and Ribeiro 2012)

Most relevant aspects aimed at children and adolescents

PCDIF covers children with disabilities and other serious health conditions (such as microcephaly due to the Zika epidemic), and in some cases there are Day Centers specifically equipped and trained for these services.

Most relevant aspects aimed at the inclusion of women and girls

Apart from the general orientation of SUAS to empower girls and women through its various services, including PCDIF, there are no specific aspects aimed at this public. Additionally, RMA does not provide data on the coverage or classification of activities that would allow us to infer a gender difference in their coverage or thematic orientation. However, it is worth remembering that in Brazil, in most cases, women are imposed the role of family caregivers of the sick, the elderly, children and PwD.

Thus, the expectation is that as an externality of the service there is a potential to protect and reduce the work overload for women caregivers, allowing them to develop self-care and develop personal life projects.

Main points of intersectorality of the initiative

Guidelines and references for other networks such as education, health and basic social protection, of medium and high complexity, in addition to interactions with the SGD (which refers many people to PCDIF).

Actions taken by the initiative during the Covid pandemic

The specific adaptations of PCDIF varied greatly in each context, given the flexibility of state and municipal teams to adapt according to the specific needs of each context. However, there was a set of more structuring actions with an effect on SUAS in general, such as:

  • Several municipal teams developed voluntary joint efforts to support the application for Emergency Aid (AE, acronym in Portuguese), although SUAS was not directly involved in AE.

  • The Federal Government maintained the IGD-Aid payments even with the temporary suspension of SUAS responsibilities in support of the program (and the PBF program itself) in 2020 and much of 2021.

  • The Federal Government generated instructional material with service protocols considering the challenge of avoiding agglomeration.

  • Through Ordinance MC No. 369, of April 29, 2020, the Federal Government distributed R$ 2.4 billion to SUAS as extraordinary credit distributed as follows among the municipalities with the highest prevalence of elderly, PwD, migrants and homeless people:

    • R$ 9.1 million was transferred to the interiorization of Venezuelan migrants and refugees;

    • R$ 158.1 million were allocated to the purchase of PPE for SUAS professionals working on the front line, serving, for example, sheltered elderly, homeless people and victims of rights violation;

    • R$ 185.6 million were transferred to the purchase of food from the elderly and people with disabilities served in the SUAS network;

    • R$ 577.7 million for the co-financing of social assistance actions, according to the needs of each location considering the pandemic.

 

  • Through Ordinances MC No. 378, of May 7, 2020, and MC No. 468, of August 13, 2020, R$ 1.5 billion were also transferred to: (a) the reorganization of activities in SUAS units; (b) the purchase of other items necessary to deal with the emergency; or (c) the expansion of social assistance offers during the pandemic. Of these:

    • R$1 billion was specifically intended to reinforce basic social protection actions;

    • R$ 437.2 million were specifically intended to reinforce Specialized Social Protection actions.

In addition to the transfer of funds, several technical guidance notes on work in the context of the pandemic were released by the MDS.


 

References
  1. GoB, Min. Desenvolvimento Social. 2009. Tipificação Nacional de Serviços Socioassistenciais - Texto da RESOLUÇÃO No. 109, DE 11 DE NOVEMBRO DE  2009. https://www.prattein.com.br/home/images/stories/PDFs/Tipificacao_AS.pdf

  2. GoB, Min. Desenvolvimento Social. 2014. PERGUNTAS E RESPOSTAS: o Redesenho do Programa de Erradicação do Trabalho Infantil 2a Versão. https://www.mds.gov.br/webarquivos/publicacao/assistencia_social/cartilhas/cartilha_perguntas_respostas_redesenho_peti_2014.pdf.

  3. GoB, Min. Cidadania. 2022. Censo SUAS e RMA – Bases e Resultados > Censo SUAS 2021 - CREAS. https://aplicacoes.mds.gov.br/snas/vigilancia/index2.php.